Papers
Papers are expected to be influential throughout the next decennium by addressing fundamental issues and proposing new agendas or in other ways offering research contributions with the potential for long-lasting impact.
Papers should make a lasting and significant contribution to our knowledge and understanding of improving computing for the human condition in a world of multiple crises.
In summary, submitted papers will be evaluated based on the extent the submission:
- offers a strong contribution to theory and practice as regards Computing (X) Crisis
- has potential for long-lasting impact
- provides new perspectives
We accept short and long papers. Submissions below 5,000 words are considered short and is allowed and encouraged for to-the-point arguments. Submissions between 5,000 and 12,000 words are considered standard long papers, while submissions exceeding 12,000 words should only be made with very good reasons.
- Please ensure that you use the correct template, the ACM Conference Proceedings Primary Article; a single-column format must be used for the reviewing phase.
- Your submission must be anonymized.
The Aarhus2025 conference follows a double-blind review process (performed by invited reviewers from the program committee) that is complemented by a meta-review (done by a primary reviewer/PC member).
Papers should make a lasting and significant contribution to our knowledge and understanding of improving computing for the human condition in a world of multiple crises.
In summary, submitted papers will be evaluated based on the extent the submission:
- offers a strong contribution to theory and practice as regards Computing (X) Crisis
- has potential for long-lasting impact
- provides new perspectives
We accept short and long papers. Submissions below 5,000 words are considered short and is allowed and encouraged for to-the-point arguments. Submissions between 5,000 and 12,000 words are considered standard long papers, while submissions exceeding 12,000 words should only be made with very good reasons.
- Please ensure that you use the correct template, the ACM Conference Proceedings Primary Article; a single-column format must be used for the reviewing phase.
- Your submission must be anonymized.
The Aarhus2025 conference follows a double-blind review process (performed by invited reviewers from the program committee) that is complemented by a meta-review (done by a primary reviewer/PC member).
Important Dates
Papers
Papers Committee
Eric Baumer
Lehigh University
Alan Borning
University of Washington
Andrea Botero
Aalto University
Tone Bratteteig
University of Oslo
Nathalie Bressa
Telecom Paris
Peter Dalsgaard
Aarhus University
Mark Diaz
Andrés Domínguez Hernández
The Alan Turing Institute
Sheena Erete
University of Maryland
Jeanette Falk
Aalborg University
Marcus Foth
Queensland University of Technology
Christopher Frauenberger
IT:U Interdisciplinary Transformation University Austria
Elisa Giaccardi
Politecnico di Milano
Colin Gray
Indiana University
Erik Grönvall
IT University of Copenhagen
Sara Heitlinger
City, University of London
Eve Hoggan
Aarhus University
Liesbeth Huybrechts
Hasselt University
Sine Just
Roskilde University
Airi Lampinen
Stockholm University
Silvia Lindtner
University of Michigan
Milagros Miceli
TU Berlin
Midas Nouwens
Aarhus University
Leysia Palen
University of Colorado
Stuart Reeves
University of Nottingham
Joanna Saad-Sulonen
IT University of Copenhagen
Antti Salovaara
Aalto University
Nitin Sawhney
MIT Media Lab
Irina Shklovski
University of Copenhagen
Rachel Smith
Aarhus University
Maurizio Teli
Aalborg University
Nervo Verdezoto
Cardiff University
Ina Wagner
TU Wien
Ron Wakkary
TU Eindhoven
Brit Winthereik
Technical University of Denmark
Volker Wulf
University of Siegen